RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment

Quinlan writes: "Moderate and hard-right Republicans may have finally reached a deal on Trumpcare 2.0, but their latest health care plan would cause premiums to skyrocket for people with pre-existing conditions."

House Speaker Paul Ryan. (photo: John Gress/Getty)
House Speaker Paul Ryan. (photo: John Gress/Getty)

Trumpcare 2.0 Would Make Premiums Spike for People With Pre-Existing Conditions

By Casey Quinlan, ThinkProgress

21 April 17


The health care plan could result in premium surcharges as high as $142,000 for people with cancer.

oderate and hard-right Republicans may have finally reached a deal on Trumpcare 2.0, but their latest health care plan would cause premiums to skyrocket for people with pre-existing conditions, according to a new report from the Center for American Progress.

A deal between House Freedom Caucus Mark Meadows (R-NC) and Tuesday Group co-chairman Tom MacArthur (D-NJ) would let states waive the community rating provision, according to The Huffington Post. The community rating provision stops insurers from charging higher premiums to people with pre-existing conditions. Moderate conservatives would allow this as long as Trumpcare 2.0 includes the Essential Health Benefits provision that was taken out of the previous version of the health care plan. However, under certain circumstances, states could waive this provision as well.

This means that under the latest Republican healthcare bill, enrollees could have premium increases of tens of thousands of dollars. The invisible risk pool Republicans have proposed would do little to offset those costs for the least healthy Americans. The CAP analysis found that people with asthma would face a premium surcharge of $4,340 and people with diabetes would face a surcharge of $5,600 a year. For pregnant individuals, insurers would charge $17,320 more for premiums. But the results were worst for patients with chronic illnesses. People with metastatic cancer would be charged $142,650 more.

The Federal Invisible Risk Sharing Program, which establishes a $15 billion fund to pool together people with expensive health conditions, would be ineffective for several reasons. First, the $15 billion would only lower annual premiums by about 1 to 2 percent each year. Second, the administrative burdens would be expensive, since it only covers the costs of certain conditions and that would require a lot of paperwork.

In an interview with the Washington Post, Kaiser Family Foundation Senior Vice President Larry Levitt reacted to the report’s findings. “No insurance company will want to cover people with expensive health conditions if they don’t have to, so they will set premiums to make sure the coverage is out of reach,” Levitt said. “Health care costs are highly concentrated among a small number of people who are sick, and they would find it impossible to get affordable coverage.”

The report noted that before the passage and phase-in of Obamacare, insurers would underwrite, or evaluate people’s health, and raise premiums or decline coverage accordingly. A 2001 Kaiser Family Foundation study found that insurers quoted premiums as high as 50 percent more for depression and 100 percent more for breast cancer, with many of the most expensive, and thus, sickest, people getting rejected. your social media marketing partner


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

+2 # reiverpacific 2017-04-21 09:52
Check out this, abut a woman who has gone to the despised Cuba for life-extending, or even perhaps saving, treatment.
Take that Drumpf and uber-hypocrite Ryan(d)!
+5 # giraffee23 2017-04-21 14:54
Those who vote to pass this "bill" should be tested for mental health. Those who vote for them in next election should stop watching Fox -

Is Trump and his cohorts smoking something? Pot smokers can't remember things and lose things -- Trump lost the navy (thinking the boats were going to No Korea when they were going down under.)
+3 # Caliban 2017-04-22 01:52
Keep Obamacare!

In fact, let's keep Obama -- if someone can figure out a legal way to get rid of the clown currently in the White House.

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.