RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment

Johnson writes: "The U.S. Justice Department is sending a message to state and local governments: Failure to comply with federal laws could have big consequences."

Attorney General Jeff Sessions speaks about crime to local, state and federal law enforcement officials in St. Louis on March 31. (photo: Jeff Roberson/AP)
Attorney General Jeff Sessions speaks about crime to local, state and federal law enforcement officials in St. Louis on March 31. (photo: Jeff Roberson/AP)

Justice Department Warns Cities, States: Comply With Federal Marijuana and Immigration Laws, or Else

By Carrie Johnson, NPR

20 April 17


he U.S. Justice Department is sending a message to state and local governments: Failure to comply with federal laws could have big consequences.

This year, most of the conversation has focused on whether sanctuary cities that limit their cooperation with federal immigration authorities will be able to keep grant money for their police departments. But veterans of the Justice Department said that's only a piece of what could be at stake.

A little-noticed portion of a memo Attorney General Jeff Sessions signed on March 31 directed his deputies to review local and state compliance with "all federal laws."

"I think it's cause for concern," said Miriam Krinsky, a former federal prosecutor who now works with newly elected district attorneys and state attorneys. "With federal money moving forward, there could be the potential for federal strings to be attached."

The Justice Department review could have implications for cities and states that extend far beyond immigration. That includes marijuana enforcement, since the drug is legal in many states but remains illegal under federal law.

"This new directive really suggests that local and state prosecutors and law enforcement agencies should proceed with caution," Krinsky said. "They need to be careful at this point who they partner with or who they seek technical assistance or funding from."

The Sessions memo drew national attention for its pledge to strengthen relationships with local police — and its skepticism toward federal probes of police departments that engage in a "pattern or practice" of unconstitutional policing.

But the document also ordered Justice Department officials to consider a wide array of activity where local law enforcement relies on help from the federal government, including grants, technical assistance and training, and participation in task forces.

Those task forces bring local and federal authorities together to crack down on violent crime, human trafficking and terrorism. The partnerships facilitate sharing of information about crime trends and policing strategies.

Krinsky worries that those bonds could "start to crumble," hurting local communities.

Laurie Robinson, who ran the Justice Department's grant-making unit under President Barack Obama, said there's a big irony at work these days.

"For an administration that came to office with endorsement from the largest and the most important police union in the country, it would be ironic that the White House is now saying that they would cut back on grants that bring federal money to police departments," Robinson said.

It's not yet clear how strictly the new team at the Justice Department will interpret their new mandate. The two officials in charge of the review, the deputy attorney general and the associate attorney general, await Senate confirmation.

And Jeff Sessions has been noting in speeches and media appearances that restrictions on some grant money because of U.S. immigration law began last year, under the Obama administration.

Following pressure from Republicans in Congress, the Obama Justice Department adopted language requiring jurisdictions to certify they followed federal immigration law. But two sources familiar with the issue told NPR they found no evidence that states or cities lost federal funding during the Obama years as a result.

The outlook in the Trump Justice Department is unknown for now. But Sessions has taken a hard line in his public statements.

"If you're not cooperating with the federal government, you're going to lose grant money," Sessions recently told a Fox News host. "We're going to battle on them every step of the way. We're going to put pressure on these cities. And it's just important for America and the people in these cities."

Robinson, who served as an assistant attorney general, said there's not much private money available to support state and local law enforcement. The alternative, she says, is cutbacks in areas like training and innovation. And that, she said, would be "tragic." your social media marketing partner


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

+16 # vamom1 2017-04-20 09:35
Seems like the money the states make from weed would sortof take the sting out of the loss of any federal money.
+5 # BoomerZoomer 2017-04-20 10:39
I agree. States may have to re-direct a portion of MJ tax revenue to police. In which case, Beauregard may be spitting into the wind. He would be wise to mind his manners, or Whoopi may bitch-slap some sense into his head.
+12 # Working Class 2017-04-20 10:14
Wish there was a way for States to say f-off. Wouldn't it be great if the GOP would live up to their mantra about States Rights on all issues? Well I guess I must be smoking something - oh shit - strike that.
+13 # PeacefulGarden 2017-04-20 10:49
Jeffery Sessions is, as my 14 year old daughter would say, a fucktard!
+13 # Buddha 2017-04-20 10:50
Since states like CA send far more in taxes to the Federal government than we get back in Federal Spending, perhaps citizens in effected states should just withhold our federal taxes and pay more to our states in compensation.

Remember how much the GOP bleats about "States Rights" when it comes to Jim Crow segregation and mass-disenfranc hisement?
0 # Robbee 2017-04-20 20:21
when are the marches? robbee's ready!

how is this happening in a democracy?

show us what democracy looks like!

show our infernal general what democracy looks like!

lets run sessions right out of government!
+2 # Wise woman 2017-04-20 20:56
The states that have already legalized mj in any form are not about to let some racist, bigoted dumbass from the southland tell them what to do. They're hauling in too many bucks for that to happen. This idiot would rather support the criminal element while allowing people who need mmj for pain continue to suffer. Where have these morons been holing up till trump dug them up?

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.